Skip to content

← All Q&A

What is the irony in OpenAI complaining about DeepSeek's potential IP violation?

Policy & EthicsLLM Moats

Drawn from Lutz Finger's Forbes column, LinkedIn writing, and Cornell teaching. Sources are cited inline so you can read the originals.

OpenAI criticizes others for what it once did itself

The irony is that OpenAI trained on Forbes, NYT, and other sources without permission. We can assume that some of my articles helped OpenAI’s initial models. Now they complain that DeepSeek might have used them. Distillation will violate most terms of service, but that did not stop OpenAI from doing the same kind of violation with news organizations. Knowledge is free, which is good and the basis for much of our growth. On the other hand, it means knowledge is hard to protect.

Is OpenAI A Victim — DeepSeek And IP Rights — A Playbook For Leaders · Forbes


Have a follow-up? hello@lutzfinger.com. Or pick another question: all Q&A →